3.3 Labor market efficiency. The efficiency of the labor market are critical for ensuring that workers are allocated to their most efficient use in the economy and provided with incentives to give their best effort in their jobs (Almeida and Carneiro, 2009; Amin, 2009; and Kaplan, 2009).
Labor market efficiency scores misalignment arose from the inhomogeneity and heterogeneity of the following facts: no flexibility of labor markets to shift workers from one economic activity to another rapidly and at low cost, and to allow for wage fluctuations without much social disruption, and also unavailability of clear relationship between worker incentives and their efforts and unavailability of equity in the business environment between women and men. Indeed, based on analysis of data of the Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010 we obtain the following:
- mean is 4,38 score, and this corresponds the El Salvador (3,36) ranked 77th;
- mode is 4,33 score, and this corresponds Germany ranked 7th; Saudi Arabia ranked 28th and Jamaica ranked 91st;
- maximum is 5,91 score, and this corresponds Singapore ranked 3rd;
- minimum is 2,91 score, and this corresponds Venezuela ranked 113rd. Then interval is 3,00 score, also note that United States (3th) – 5,76; Kazakhstan (18th) – 4,93; Germany (70th) is 4,33 and Turkey (120th) – 3,65 scores;
- skewness coefficient is 0,080, and this appropriate distribution of the labor market efficiency scores shift the mean to the right;
- kurtosis coefficient is 0,378, and this appropriate distribution relatively normal distribution is the upright.
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |
