Korgalzhyn State Nature Reserve’s (KSNR) visitor management section analysis
Based on the interview and documentary researches, several problems with the visitor management subsystem were identified.
Table 1: KSNR’s visitor management subsystem findings
Visitor Management
|
Theory
|
KSNR
|
Problems
|
Implication
|
Visitor Management Programs:
| | | |
There are three eco routs and limited tourist number with special permission and acquaintance of the staffs.
| | | |
There are three eco routs and limited tourist number with special permission and acquaintance of the staffs.
| | | |
Inadequacy of the service and limited quantity of specially allocated sites of territory for acquaintance with the nature. For this reason, independent visits of citizens are seldom to be found. It causes stream of tourists is significantly limited
| | | |
The management would brief the tourists about general information needed to stay in the territory, safety precautions regulations, fire safety, sanitary condition, and how to treat the reserved features. Otherwise it might cause more problems in maintenance management, ecosystem management fields
|
Understanding the Visitor:
|
| | | |
Visitors are satisfied
| | | |
Visitors are satisfied
| | | |
Visitors are satisfied
| | | |
Visitors are satisfied
|
Note: available input
presence of problem
absence of problem
The first column of the table above displays inputs which are considered in management process. These inputs are inhesion for management of all protected areas categories and outdoor recreational places. Therefore, KSNR belongs to Ia category “Strict Nature Reserve”, inputs such as, concession management, area planning, and site planning not considered in KSNR’s management. Second column shows what KSNR has. Third column shows the presence or absence of the problems in listed inputs, which are described bellow in detail. The fourth column provides implication.
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |