Косметика өндірісі мен технологиясына кіріспе
жүктеу/скачать 16,24 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
b436ce0a649361871333ff7a454fb4e8 original.17032999
| J Anat
. 2005;206(3):265 – 270. 39. Dhar, S.: Newborn skin care revisited. Indian J Dermatol. 2007;52:1 – 4. 40. Imokawa, G., Akasaki, S., Minematsu, Y., et al.: Importance of intercellular lipids in water-retention properties of the stratum corneum: induction and recovery study of sur- factant dry skin. Arch Dermatol Res. 1989;281:45 – 51. 41.
Lopez-Castellano, A., Cortell-Ivars, C., Lopez-Carballo, G., et al.: The influence of Span 20 on the stratum corneum lipids in Langmuir monolayers: comparison with azone. Int J Pharma. 2000;203:245 – 253. 42. Saad, P., Flach, C. R., Walters, R. M., Mendelsohn, R.: Infrared spectroscopic studies of sodium dodecyl sulphate permeation and interaction with stratum corneum lipids in skin. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2012;34:36 – 43. 43. Löffler, H., Happle, R.: Profile of irritant patch testing with detergents: sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate and alkyl polyglucoside. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;48(1):26 – 32. 44. Cork, M. J., Danby, S., Vasilopoulos, Y., et al.: Epidermal Barrier Dysfunction. In: Reitamo, S., Luger, T. A., Steinhoff, M., eds: Textbook of Atopic Dermatitis , London: Informa Healthcare; 2008. 45. Fevola, M. J., LiBrizzi, J. J., Walters, R. M.: Reducing irritation potential of surfactant-based cleansers with hydrophobically-modified polymers. Polymer Preprints. 2008;49(2):671 – 672. 46. Ehretsmann, C., Schaefer, P., Adam, R.: Cutaneous tolerance of baby wipes by infants with atopic dermatitis, and comparison of the mildness of baby wipe and water in infant skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2001;15(1):16 – 21. 47.
Odio, M., Streicher-Scott, J., Hansen, R. C.: Disposable baby wipes: efficacy and skin mildness. Dermatol Nurs. 2001;13(2):107 – 112. 48. Lavender, T., Furber, C., Campbell, M., et al.: Effect on skin hydration of using baby wipes to clean the napkin area of newborn babies: assessor-blinded randomised controlled equivalence trial, BMC Pediatr . 2012;12:59. 49. Nash, J. F., Gettings, S. D., Diembeck, W., et al.: A toxicological review of topical exposure to white mineral oils. Food Chem Toxicol. 1996;34(2):213 – 225. 50. Liptak, G.S.: Diaper Rash. In: Hoekelman, R., Adam, H. M., Nelson, N. M., et al., eds: Pediatric Primary Care , Maryland Heights: Mosby, 2001. 51. Ravanfar, P., Wallace, J. S., Pace, N. C.: Diaper dermatitis: a review and update. Curr Opin Pediatr . 2012;24(4):472 – 479. 52.
Atherton, D. J.: The aetiology and management of irritant diaper dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2001;15(1):1 – 4. 53. Nield, L. S., Kamat, D.: Prevention, diagnosis, and management of diaper dermatitis. Clin Pediatr. 2007;46(6):480 506 – 486.
54. CFR Title 21 Part 347 Skin Protectant Drug Products for Over-The-Counter Human Use 55. Schönrock, U.: Baby Care. In: Barel, A. O., Paye, M., Maibach, H., eds: Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology , New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 2001. 56. Odio, M. R., O’Connor, R. J., Sarbaugh, F., et al.: Continuous topical administration of a petrolatum formulation by a novel disposable diaper. 2. Effect on skin condition. Derma- tology. 2000;200(3):238 – 243. 57. Farrington, E.: Diaper dermatitis. Pediatric Nursing . 1992;18(8):81 – 82. EPA: Particulate Matter (PM): Basic Information, Last updated: 3/18/2013, Accessed 3/12/2014 at http://www.epa. gov/airquality/particulatematter/basic.html 58. Gottschalck, T. E., Breslawec, H. P.: International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook , 14th Edition, Washington, DC: Personal Care Products Council, 2012. 59.
Rigel, D.S.: Cutaneous ultraviolet exposure and its relationship to the development of skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2008;58(5):S129 – S132. 60. CDC: Sun-protection behaviors used by adults for their children: United States, 1997. 61. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 1998;47(23):480 – 482. 62. Etzel, R., Balk, S.: Pediatric Environmental Health . 2nd Edition, Elk Grove Village: Amer- ican Academy of Pediatrics, 2003. 63.
Diffey, B. L. Sunscreens: Use and Misuse, In: Giacomoni, P. U., ed.: Sun Protection in Man , Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2001. 64.
Azurdia, R. M., Pagliaro, J. A., Rhodes, L. E.: Sunscreen application technique in pho- tosensitive patients: a quantitative assessment of the effect of education. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed . 2000;16(2):53 – 56. 65. Diffey, B. L.: Has the sun protection factor had its day? BMJ. 2000;320:176 – 177. 66. Bandi, P., Cokkinides, V. E., Weinstock, M. A., et al.: Sunburns, sun protection and indoor tanning behaviors, and attitudes regarding sun protection benefits and tan appeal among parents of U.S. adolescents-1998 compared to 2004.
Pediatr Dermatol . 2010;27(1):9 – 18. 67. Diffey, B. L.: When should sunscreen be reapplied? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:882 – 885. 68. Cross, S. E., Innes, B., Roberts, M. S., et al.: Human skin penetration of sunscreen nanopar- ticles: in-vitro assessment of a novel micronized zinc oxide formulation. Skin Pharmacol Physiol . 2007;20(3):148 – 154. 69. Schlossman, D., Shao, Y.: Inorganic Ultraviolet Filters, In: Shaath, N. A., ed.: Sunscreens, Regulations and Commercial Development , 3rd Edition, Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis, 2005. 70. van der Molen, R. G., Hurks, H. M. H., Out-Luiting, C.: Efficacy of micronized titanium dioxide containing compounds in protection against UVB-induced immunosuppression in humans in vivo .
B. 1998;44:143 – 150. 71. Alonso, C., Larburu, I., Bon, E., et al.: Efficacy of petrolatum jelly for the prevention of diaper rash: a randomized clinical trial J Special Pediatr Nurs. 2013;18:123 – 132. 72. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. PEDIASTAT™ (miconazole nitrate, USP 0.25%) Diaper Rash Ointment NDA 21-026, Accessed 4/4/2014 at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/00/backgrd/3626b2a_ Efficacy.pdf 73. Safety Assessment of Talc as Used in Cosmetics, Final Report, Release Date: 4/12/2013 74. Tremewan, H. C.: Tetanus neonatorum in New Zealand. NZ Med J. 1946;45:312. 75. Industrial Minerals Association-North America (IMA-NA) and EUROTALC. RE: Scientific Literature Review: Talc as Used in Cosmetics. 10/19/2012. 76.
FDA: BAM: Microbiological Methods for Cosmetics, Last Update: 4/8/2013, Accessed 3/12/2014 at http://www.fda.gov/food/foodscienceresearch/ laboratorymethods/ucm073598.htm 77.
EURL ECVAM Progress Report on the Development, Validation and Reg- ulatory Acceptance of Alternative Methods, 2013, Accessed 3/15/2014 at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/pdf/ EURL_ECVAM_progress_ report_cosmetics_2013.pdf 78. Eye Irritation, Accessed 3/15/2014 at http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/sectors/cosmetics/ files/doc/ antest/%285%29_chapter_3/3_eye_irritation_en.pdf 79. Cottin, M. Zanvit, A.: Fluorescein leakage test: a useful tool in ocular safety assessment. Toxicology In Vitro. 1997;11(4):399 – 405. 507 80.
Fluorescein Leakage (FL) Test, DB-ALM Protocol n ∘ 71, Accessed 3/15/2014 at http://ecvam-dbalm.jrc. ec.europa.eu/public_view_ |