Participants leave the hall, the presenter at that moment hangs a
poster with a list of roles. Time for traveling through the building and
writing the text is not specifically stipulated. The volume of the text is
either. When the first participant begins to read what he has written,
all the others on the clean sheets write his name, and next - the
intended role. If someone can not define someone, he does not write
anything against the name. Names with roles it is desirable to write in
a column. After all the stories have been read, the presenter names the
first participant's name, the others in turn name his alleged role. The
latter is his role, he says. And so on.
Discussion: Who felt himself in the role? Were there any
discoveries? What was difficult, which is easy? How different was the
perception?
10. "Escape" The moderator informs the group that half of the group's members
were captured by the "terrorists" and became "hostages". But the
remaining players did not waste time and prepared the escape.
"Hostages" need to communicate an escape plan. Since they are all in
different places, each is sent to a separate player to communicate the
escape plan. Naturally, everyone has their own plan. To report the
escape plan is necessary only by gestures, since it is not safe to shout
out loud: security can be heard. This should be done quickly enough,
within 1 to 2 minutes, because there is a risk of being noticed by
"terrorists". (Work goes in pairs simultaneously.)
After the end of the messages, each "hostage" in turn tells
everyone about the escape plan that was prepared for him. After the
story of each "hostage", the one who prepared this plan tells his
230
version. Stories are compared. If they coincide in the basic details,
then the "hostage" is considered exempt, if not - remains in captivity.