ӘДЕБИЕТТЕР:
1. Regier W.G. (2007). In praise of flattery. - University of Nebraska Press, 2007. – 189 р.
2. Walzer A.E. Parrēsia, Foucault, and the Classical Rhetorical Tradition // Rhetoric Society
Quarterly, 2013. - №43(1). - Р. 1-21. doi: 10.1080/02773945.2012.740130
3. Landauer M. Parrhesia and the demos tyrannos: Frank speech, flattery and accountability
in democratic Athens // History of Political Thought, 2012. - №33(2). - Р. 185-208.
4. Gibson B. Managing the past: Plinian strategies in the panegyrici latini // Arethusa, 2013.
- №46(2). - Р. 217-240. doi: 10.1353/are.2013.0011
5. Maehler H. Pindar und die Tyrannen // Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae,
2011. - №51(1). - Р. 1-7. doi: 10.1556/aant.51.2011.1.1
6. Decosimo D. An umma of accountability Al-Ghaza¯li¯against domination // Soundings,
2015. - №98(3). - Р. 260-288. doi: 10.5325/soundings.98.3.0260
7. Holgado E.C. Non-verbal expressions as performative statements: Prepositional
constructions and emphatic appeals // Circulo de Linguistica Aplicada a la Comunicacion,
2016. - №66. - Р. 3-22. doi: 10.5209/CLAC.52767
8. Cavazza N. The tone dilemma: Comparing the effects of flattery and verbal aggression in
a political speech // Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2017. -№36(5). - Р. 585-598.
doi: 10.1177/0261927X17698186
9. De Haan C., Andeweg B., Blokzijl W. You're the best: Ingratiation techniques in informative
presentations // SEFI 2005 Annual Conference: Engineering Education at the Cross-Roads of
Civilizations, 2005. Ankara, 7-10 September. – 112883. – Р. 207–213.
10. Kapust D.J. (2018). Flattery and the history of political thought: That glib and oily art. -
Cambridge University Press, 2018. – 230 р.
11. Markovits E. As if we were codgers: Flattery, parrhēsia and old man demos in
Aristophanes’ Knights // Polis, 2012. - №29(1). – Р. 108–129. doi: 10.1163/20512996-
90000198