Доклады казахской академии образования Ежеквартальный журнал издается с 2008 года
жүктеу/скачать 2,64 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
KAO-3-2020
- Бұл бет үшін навигация:
- First Modernization Second Modernization
| 1.
The economic context, multilingualism and intercultural communication Homogeneous society, where expectations for action and human behaviour are fully stabilized, the individual is not confronted with unexpected situations, is already in many parts of the world subject of change. Obviously cultural heterogeneity in many countries is not a recent feature, minority ethnic groups have always existed in geographically delimited areas of many human groups defined as a nation. However, regardless of ethnicity, the individuals of a national state are identified and they are still identified with the national state where they live. One of the effects of globalization is just changing this image about the nation. Paradigmatic of the two phases of modernization of societies there can be identified several pairs of characteristics that find their form of expression both in macro structures, such as the society itself, the economy, the education, and in micro structures as well as such as foreign language learning. These pairs of features (Table 1) should not be understood as antonyms. 284 Table 1: The characteristics of First and Second Modernization First Modernization Second Modernization structure-oriented thinking process-oriented thinking autonomy attempt integration into networks control own internal dynamic concreteness vagueness either …. or as well …. as coherent identities cohesive identities closeness openness delimitation diffusion circularity ramification Homogeneity in principle ensures a climate of trust, and without this condition the human interaction was and is still unthinkable. But in terms of current economic globalization we can’t talk about such stability anymore. Moving in different cultural spaces and dealing with a variety of value systems make cultural homogeneity no more a self-evident condition. By integration in different contexts, in the most cases from different geographical areas, an individual is compelled to develop multiple identities; he is subjected to a process of hybridization, creolization [2]. The oscillation between identity and alterity is on the one hand recognition of differences, and on the other hand the searching within these differences of general normative benchmarks, of some “ consensual islands ” that ensure a balance in the interaction. The alternation between homogenizing globalization, based on the Western capitalism, and the жүктеу/скачать 2,64 Mb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|