SCIENCE AND EDUCATION IN THE MODERN WORLD:
CHALLENGES OF THE XXI CENTURY"
ASTANA, KAZAKHSTAN, FEBRUARY 2023
30
b) Idioms that come from a specific social and professional context and then spread:
opening fire, dying in a line, arming (in military cases), sailing under false pretenses, going to
sea (sea). case), female gilding (female), hitting below the waist, taking the ball before the limit
(sports).
c) Idioms from folklore, ancient mythology, the Bible and the works of individual
authors: rape of a cat (folklore), opening the lid of the Pandora's box (ancient mythology),
fattening calf (Bible).
d) borrowed from a foreign language, most often in the form of paralysis: swimming
against the current, laying down arms (from French), twisting roses, roof salt (from Latin).
However, this category does not exclude one elite group, but rather overlaps the other, ie
the choice of these groups is based on many principles. Thus, Z.A .Anisimova chooses idioms
and idioms among the idioms she analyzes, starting from the degree of semantic complexity of
the studied formations. At the center of the distribution of the phraseological units with
taxonomic character are the semantic relations of the components of this unit (one component
classifies the other). In this context, this classification seems to have failed us [4, 35].
The disadvantage of such a classification is that grouping is based on different principles,
so the same expression can be grouped into two or three different groups. For example, dozens
of bakery formations fall into the first and second groups and find their own impetus. Placement
of weapons - the second and the fourth.
The classification of phraseology units is very common today. It is based on a dictionary,
a grammar center or a keyword in a sentence, ie a word that follows all the other words that
make up the idiom.
Based on the number of keywords that A.I.Smirnitsky called the peak of meaning, all
phraseology units are divided into continuous expressions, defined by a fixed combination of one
keyword and two or more keywһords. In the middle of the discussion, Professor A.I.Smirnitsky
distinguished three subgroups based on morphological composition.
1) Quality-nominal: apples of betrayal and conflict.
2) verb-adverb: I surrender, I resign.
3) intention-noun: from the heart, in the hand.
According to the A.I.Smirnitsky classification, fixed combinations are also divided into
several groups.
1) verb-noun: I go to sleep.
2) intent-noun: face to face.
3) combinations of sentences, ie predictive combinations with proverbs: each cloud has a
silver background [5, 70].
The indefinite term for this category is "keyword" or "semantic peak". It is not clear
whether we are talking about the editorial center or the center of importance.
At the same time, it is not legitimate to combine qualitatively different sections such as
idioms (bed, face to face) and proverbs and idioms in whole sentences that can not be considered
an integral part of the same "fixed combinations".
Many researchers base their classification on the nature of the syntactic connections of
the components of an expression unit. For example, following V.P. Sukhotin and several other
scholars, T.A. Barabash considers the syntactic relational properties of the components of a
speech unit to be "internal forms" as opposed to "external forms".
|