192
instrumental-methodical (maintenance of actual contacts with employers, formation of databases,
identification and monitoring of key performance indicators of the center, etc.). Leveling the consequences of
problems, increasing the effectiveness of the work of the centers and ensuring the positive dynamics of the
indicator of profile employment require an integrated solution and changing the technology of interaction
between the main participants throughout the preparation period, from the stage of attracting and selecting
entrants to employment and monitoring the degree of satisfaction with the training and work received.
Summing up, it can be noted that the world practice of promoting youth employment differs in the va0riety
of forms used, the depth of involvement of the subjects of interaction and the measure of regulatory and
regulatory provision. Russian practice is in the process of development: normative and legal grounds are being
developed and applied tools for providing assistance to profile employment. The center of employment of the
university is recognized as the key institution in the mechanism of interaction. An analysis of the effectiveness
of the activities of the centers and the specifics of the formation of channels of cooperation reveals a number
of problems that are largely due to passive and intermediary participation in the promotion of employment.
Negative tendencies have been identified, which increase the likelihood of growth in youth unemployment and
the growth of socioeconomic consequences of underutilization of the professional potential of students. The
suggestions-regulators on the promotion of employment are considered and the organizational difficulties of
their implementation are revealed.
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: