и. и. прибыток. М., 2008. с. 90–96.
Blokh M. Y.
2004. P. 179–197.
I. P. Krylova. Moscow, 1974. P. 109–112/
60
Section III
synTax
19. phrase: general characteristics
Syntax is a part of grammar which treats of phrases and sentences.
B. A. Ilyish says that the theory of phrase seems to be the least developed
element of English grammar whereas the theory of sentence has a long
and fruitful history. Phrase is a separate linguistic unit which must be
considered on a separate level of linguistic analysis.
Phrase is broadly defined as every combination of two or more
words which is a grammatical unit but not an analytical form of some
word (e. g. the perfect forms of verbs). According to this definition the
constituent elements of a phrase may belong to any part of speech. But
there is another interpretation of phrase, introduced by V. V. Vinogradov,
stipulating that a phrase must contain at least two notional words. The
inconvenience of this restriction for English grammar is that the group
“preposition
+
noun” remains outside the classification and is neglected
in the theory of syntax.
The number of constituents in a phrase is usually from two to five,
although six or eight are not excluded. Actually, this limit is set by
human mind capacities. There may be as many words in a phrase as
can be kept in mind and identified as a phrase. Structural identity of a
phrase in a sentence can be shown through the methods of substitution
and representation developed by V. V. Burlakova. The first method is
based on the fact that there are quite a number of words which function
as substituting elements, of substitutes, or Pro-Forms. The obvious
pro-forms for noun-phrases are the pronouns
he
,
she
,
it
,
they
, e. g.:
John’s father did not know about it. He just thought…
Some other items
which can be pro-forms for noun-phrases are:
that
,
those
,
one
,
none
,
some
,
any
,
both
,
all
,
each
,
either
,
neither.
Some time-relaters can be
61
pro-forms for time adjuncts, e. g.:
We saw John
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: