References
1. Hacking, I. (1983),
Representing and Intervening
,
Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
2. Kolchinsky, E. I. (2006),
Ernst Mayr and the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis
, Moscow, Russian Acad-
emy of Sciences, St. Petersburg Branch of the S. I. Vavilov-Institute for the history of natural science and
technology. (In Russian)
3. Mayr, E. (1994), The advance of science and scientific revolution,
Journal of the history of behavioral
sciences
, vol. 30, pp. 328–334.
4. Mayr, E. (1985),
The Growth of Biological Thought, Cambridge,
Mass.: Harvard University Press.
5. Junker, Т. and Hossfeld, U. (2007),
The Discovery of Evolution: A Revolutionary Theory and its History
,
transl. by Popov I. Yu., St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press. (In Russian)
6.
Levit, G. S. and Hossfeld, U. (2020), Theories of evolution and their history from the philosophy of
science perspective, in Osipov, I. D. and Pogodin, S. N. (eds),
Philosophy of Science in the Modern World
,
St. Petersburg: Politekh-Press Publ., pp. 294–328. (In Russian)
7.
Levit, G. S. and Kutschera, U. (2010), “Extended Synthesis” vs. “Generalized Darwinism”, in Kolchin-
sky, E. I. and Fedotova, A. A. (eds),
Charles Darwin and Modern Biology,
St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia Publ.,
pp. 674–683. (In Russian)
8.
Reif, W. E. (2000), Darwinism, Gradualism and Uniformitarianism,
Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und
Paläontologie
, vol. 11, pp. 669–680.
9.
Levit, G. S. and Olsson, L. (2006), “Evolution on Rails”: Mechanisms and Levels of Orthogenesis,
Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology
, vol. 11, pp. 97–136.
10. Romanes, G. J. (1895),
Darwin and after Darwin
, vol. 2, Chicago: Open Court.
11. Levit, G. S. and Hossfeld, U. (2006), The Forgotten “Old Darwinian” Synthesis: The Evolutionary
Theory of Ludwig H. Plate (1862–1937),
NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences,
Technology and Medicine
, vol. 14, pp. 9–25.
12. Bowler, P. J. (1983),
The Eclipse of Darwinism
, Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University
Press.
13. Bowler, P. J. (1992),
The Non-Darwinian Revolution
, Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins Uni-
versity Press.
14. Levit, G. S., Meister, K. and Hoßfeld, U. (2008), Alternative Evolutionary Theories from the Histori-
cal Perspective,
Journal of Bioeconomics
, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 71–96.
15. Bowler, P. J. (2004), The specter of Darwinism: The Popular Image of Darwinism in Early Twentieth-
Century Britain, in Lustig, A., Richards, R. J. and Ruse, M. (eds),
Darwinian Heresies
, New York:
Cambridge
University Press, pp. 48–68.
16. Mayr, E. (1982),
The Growth of Biological Thought
, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
17. Levit, G. S. and Hossfeld, U. (2017), Major Research Traditions in Twentieth-Century Evolutionary
Biology: The Relations of Germany’s Darwinism with Them, in Delisle, R. (ed.),
The Darwinian Tradition in
Context
, Cham: Springer Nature, pp. 169–193.
18. Nordenskiöld, E. (1928),
The History of Biology
, New York: Tudor Publishing.
19. Junker, T. (2004),
Die zweite darwinsche Revolution: Geschichte des synthetischen Darwinismus in
Deutschland, 1924–1950
, Marburg: Basilisken-Presse.
20. Mayr, E. (1980), Prologue: Some Thoughts on the History of the Evolutionary Synthesis, in Mayr,
E. and Provine, W. B. (eds),
The Evolutionary Synthesis
, Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.
21. Bowler, P. J. (2003),
Evolution: The history of Idea
, Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Zavarzin, G. A. (1974),
Phenotypic Systematics of Bacteria: The space of logical possibilities
, Moscow:
Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
23. Levit, G. S. and Hossfeld, U. (2011), Darwin without borders? Looking at “generalised Darwinism”
through the prism of the “hourglass model”,
Theory in Biosciences,
vol.
130, pp. 299–312.
24. Liubishchev, A. А. (1973), Darwinism and Non-Darwinism,
Priroda
, vol. 10, pp. 44–47. (In Russian)
25. Mayr, E. (1991),
One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Modern Evolutionary
Thought
, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
26. Georgievskij, A. B. (2009),
Evolutionary Anthropology
, St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia Publ. (In Rus-
sian)
27. Mayr, E. (1999), Thoughts on the Evolutionary Synthesis in Germany, in Junker, T. and Engels, E.-M.
(eds),
Die Entstehung der Synthetischen Theorie: Beitrage zur Geschichte der Evolutionsbiologie in Deutschland
,
Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung, S. 19–30.
28. Simpson, G. G. (1949),
The Meaning of Evolution. A Study of the History of Life and of Its Significance
for Man
, New Haven: Yale University Press.
246
Вестник СПбГУ. Философия и конфликтология. 2021. Т. 37. Вып. 2
29. Gilbert, S. F. and Epel, D. (2009),
Ecological Developmental Biology
, Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
30. Wimsatt, W. C. and Schank, J. C. (1988), Two Constraints on the Evolution of Complex Adaptations
and the Means for Their Avoidance, in Nitecki, M. (ed.),
Progress in Evolution
, Chicago:
The University of
Chicago Press, pp. 213–273.
31. McShea, D. (2005), The Evolution of Complexity Without Natural Selection, a Possible Large-Scale
Trend of the Fourth Kind,
Paleobiology
, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 146–156.
32. Cairns, J., Overbaugh, J. and Miller, S. (1988), The origin of Mutants,
Nature
, vol. 335, pp. 142–145.
33. Jablonka, E. and Lamb, M. (2005),
Evolution in Four Dimensions
, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
34. Theissen, G. (2006), The Proper Place of Hopeful Monsters
in Evolutionary Biology,
Theory in Bio-
sciences
, vol. 3–4, pp. 349–369.
35. Müller, G. B. (2017), Why an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis Is Necessary,
Interface Focus
, vol. 7,
no. 5. Available at: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0015 (accessed: 10.12.2020).
36. Kutschera, U. and Niklas, K. J. (2004), The Modern Theory of Biological Evolution: An Expanded
Synthesis,
Naturwissenschaften
, vol. 91, pp. 255–276.
37. Lakatos, I. (1970), Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, in Lakatos,
I. and Musgrave, F. (eds),
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium
in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965
, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–196.
38. Pievani, T. (2012), An Evolving Research Programme: The Structure of Evolutionary Theory from
a Lakatosian Perspective, in Fasolo, A. (ed.),
The Theory of Evolution and Its Impact
, Milano: Springer.
39. Mayr, E. (1942),
Systematics and the Origin of Species
, New York: Columbia University Press.
40. Dobzhansky, Th. (1937),
Genetics and the Origin of Species
, New York: Columbia University Press.
41. Pigliucci, M. (2009), An Extended Synthesis for Evolutionary Biology,
Annals of the New York Aca-
demy of Sciences
, vol. 1168, pp. 218–228.
42. Fabregas-Tejeda, A. and Vergara-Silva, F. (2018), The Emerging Structure of the Extended Evolution-
ary Synthesis: Where Does Evo-Devo Fit In?
Theory in Biosciences
, vol. 137, pp. 169–184.
43. Noble, D. (2015),
Evolution Beyond Neo-Darwinism,
Journal of Experimental Biology
, vol. 218,
pp. 7–13.
Received: January 28, 2021
Accepted: March 10, 2021
Au t h o r s’ i n f o r m at i o n :
Georgy S. Levit
— Dr. Sci. in the History of Biology, Associate Professor (Privatdozent);
georgelevit@gmx.net
Uwe Hossfeld
— Dr. Sci. in the History of Natural Science, Dr. Sci. in Philosophy, Professor;
uwe.hossfeld@uni-jena.de