1 Қазақстан республикасы білім және ғылым министрлігі
partiality is more a translation tool than a flaw in translator’s
жүктеу/скачать 14,62 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
Құрышжанов оқулары 2019
partiality is more a translation tool than a flaw in translator’s ability to render the content of the source message in its full. This evidently does not apply to the pragmatic equivalence which is a universal prerequisite of good translation. Important branch of the theory of translation is concerned with the study of source text and target text units which can replace each other in the translating process. The creation of equivalent texts results in the equivalence of correlated language units I the two texts. In any two languages there are pairs of units which are of identical or similar communicative value and can replace each other in translation. The communicative value of a language element depends both on its own semantics and on the way it is used in speech. Therefore translation equivalence mat be established between units occupying dissimilar places in the system of respective languages.To sum up, the notion of equivalence is undoubtedly one of the most problematic and controversial areas in the field of translation theory. The term has caused, and it seems quite probable that it will continue to cause, heated debates within the field of translation studies.This term has been analyzed, evaluated and extensively discussed from different points of view and has been approached from many different perspectives. The first discussions of the notion of equivalence in translation initiated the further elaboration of the term by contemporary theorists. Even the brief outline of the issue given above indicates its importance within the framework of the theoretical reflection on translation. The difficulty in defining equivalence seems to result in the impossibility of having a universal approach to this notion. The translators use equivalents to give right meaning of the given word or word combinations.Therefore every translator must translate given texts in proper way. References: 1.Komissarov V.N., Koralova A.L. A manual of translation from English into Russian. – Москва: Высшая школа, 1990. -4б. 2.Сдобников В.В., Петрова О.В. Теория перевода. –Мо - сква: Восток –Запад, 2006. -255;256 3.Miram G.E., Daineko V.V., Taranukha L.A., Grsichenko M.V., Gon A.M. Basic translation. – Kyiv: Nika-Center, 2002. -58-64 б. 4.Казакова Т.А. Практические основы перевода . –Санкт- Петербург, 2002.-25 б. 5.Рецкер Я.И. Учебное пособие по переводу с английского языка на русский. – Москва: 1971. -54 б. 6.https://translationjournal.net/journal/14equiv.htm 7.Келімбетов Н. Үміт үзгім келмейді. – Алматы: Рари - тет, 2011. -13 p. 8.Kelimbetov N. I don’t want to lose hope. Translated by Shynar Kelimbetova, London: Lowndes Group Ltd, 2013. 20 p. |