Particles that go beyond light speed? Not so fast, many theoretical
physicists say
In case you missed the news, a team of physicists reported in
September that the tiny subatomic particles known as neutrinos could
violate the cosmic speed limit set by Einstein‟s special theory of relativity.
The researchers, working on an experiment called OPERA, beamed
neutrinos through the earth‟s crust, from CERN, the laboratory for
particle physics near Geneva, to Gran Sasso National Laboratory in
L‟Aquila, Italy, an underground physics lab. According to the scientists‟
estimates, the neutrinos arrived at their destination around 60
nanoseconds quicker than the speed of light.
Experts urged caution, especially because an earlier measurement of
neutrino velocity had indicated, to high precision and accuracy, that
neutrinos do respect the cosmic speed limit. In a terse paper posted
online on September 29, Andrew Cohen and Sheldon Glashow of Boston
University calculated that any neutrinos traveling faster than light would
lose energy after emitting, and leaving behind, a trail of slower particles
that would be absorbed by the earth‟s crust. This trace would be
analogous to a sonic boom left behind a supersonic fighter jet.
Yet the neutrinos detected at Gran Sasso were just as energetic as
when they left Switzerland, Cohen and Glashow point out, casting doubt
on the veracity of the speed measurements. “When all particles have the
same maximal attainable velocity, it is not possible for one particle to
lose energy by emitting another,” Cohen explains. “But if the maximal
46
velocities of the particles involved are not all the same, then it can
happen
”.
An effect of this type is well known in cases where electrons have the
higher speed limit (light speed), and light itself has the lower one
because it is slowed down by traveling in a medium, such as water or air.
Electrons, then, can move in the medium at a speed higher than the
maximum speed of photons in the same medium and can lose energy by
emitting protons. This transfer of energy between particles with different
speed limits is called Cherenkov radiation, and it makes the reactor pools
of nuclear power stations glow with a bluish light.
In the neutrinos‟ case, Cohen and Glashow calculate that the wake
would mostly consist of electrons paired with their antimatter twins,
positrons. Crucially, the rate of production of these electron-position pairs
is such that a typical superluminal neutrino emitted at CERN would lose
most of its energy before reaching Gran Sasso. Then again, perhaps
they were not superluminal to begin with.
“I think this seals the case,” says Lawrence M.Krauss, a theoretical
physicist at Arizona State University. “It is a very good paper.” So was
Albert Einstein right after all? Einstein‟s relativity superseded Isaac
Newton‟s physics, and physicists will no doubt keep trying to find glitches
in Einstein‟s theories, too. “We never stop testing our ideas,” Cohen
says. “Even those that have been established well”.
From Scientific American (December 2011),
by Davide Castelvecchi.
2. Give the plural of the following nouns, which are found in scientific
prose. Find their Russian equivalents.
Agenda, analysis, antenna, apparatus, automaton, axis, bacillus,
bacterium, basis, crisis, criterion, curriculum, datum, formula, helix,
hypothesis, index, lamina, locus, maximum, medium, memorandum,
47
minimum, nebula, nucleus, phenomenon, radius, stimulus, stratum,
terminus, thesis, vertebra, vertex.
3. Engineers and scientists have produced a code of standard symbols
for convenient representation of physical quantities. Write down and
memorize the symbols (abbreviations) which are used as equivalents to
the following terms:
length, mass, time, volume, velocity, work, power, temperature, foot,
pound, second, gallon, horsepower, ampere, metre, gram, kilogram, litre,
watt, volt, kilocalorie.
Note the English and American spelling of the following words:
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |