Нариманова А, Сарсенбаева Т. Ғылыми жетекші
жүктеу/скачать 425,5 Kb.
|
Татьянаб Ару — диплом
диплом 20, диплом 20, диплом 20, Абай өлеңі, азия, Ақыл ой жан қуаты, Тест cұрақтары ББ IT қолдану Студентке, кіріспе практика, кіріспе практика, кіріспе практика, кіріспе практика, кіріспе практика, кіріспе практика, кіріспе практика, Резюме
| CONCLUSION
Summing up the main conclusions of our work, we can point out the following: Numerical names are lexical units in accordance with the purpose of the study not as a linguocultural unit. When considering the concept of complex names made up of numerical concepts in the Kazakh language from an ethnolinguistic point of view, the language units that are used as research material include expressions of National Knowledge, phrases such as five good, three nine with a circle, five weapons, six Alash, created with the participation of numerical concepts that are units of knowledge. If we proceed from the theory of ethnolinguistic concepts, any unity in language is a reflection of knowledge. He didn't take it all into his work. We are interested only in the relief of these units, which distinguishes our language from other languages. Therefore, only ethnolinguistic types of concepts that reflect the worldview of the nation, knowledge accumulated in the experience of the nation, and national culture were considered. Based on the research conducted in the course of writing the thesis, we learned a lot of information about the ancient worldview, history, and culture of our people. In general, in the course of our research, we have found that the tradition of sanctifying numbers and counting it is a phenomenon that has overtaken many peoples. We have noticed that the sanctity of numbers is a phenomenon that is characteristic not only for the Turkic peoples, but also for many peoples of the world. In the work, the numbers were considered real. The reason for the emergence of realities was the comparative study of the names of material cultures in the two languages. Although there are similarities in culture, there are inequalities in language became the basis for the formation of a new concept in the field of linguocultural studies. REFERENCES 1 Kazakh encyclopedia: General Ed. "I Don't Know," He Said.8 Vol. - Almaty: Metaphase-Olka publ., 2006. - 664 P. 2 Kenesbayev I. concepts related to "seven", "three", "nine", "forty".Problems of Kazakh linguistics=problems of Kazakh language. Almaty, 2008. - p. 176-186. 3 Marr Ya. N.on digital // language problems on digital. L.: LSU, 2007 – - 270 P. 4 atabayeva M. S. ethnolinguistic basis of dialect vocabulary of the Kazakh language.- Almaty, 2006. - 284b. 5 Humboldt V. von. Culture of language and philosophy.Moscow, 2005-254c. 6 Potebnya, A. A. Mysl and yazyk / A. A. Potebnya. Moscow: Labyrinth, 2007. -241 P. 7 Sepir E. Yazyk. Introduction to the study of speech. Moscow: izd – Vo Direct-Media, 2007 – - 447 P. 8 Zwegintsev V. A. thought about linguistics. Moscow: izd-Vo MGU, 2006 — - 336 P. 9 Tolstoy, N. I. language and folk culture : essays on Slavic mythology and ethnolinguistics. Moscow: Indrik publ., 1995. - 509 P. 10 Bazen L. The concept of the age of ancient Turkic peoples / / Zarubezhnaya Turkology. 1 issue. Moscow: 2004. -187 P. 11 Sossur F. De course General Linguistics. Moscow: URSS editorial, 2007. - 257 c 12 G. Smagulova. Academician A. Kaidar and Kazakh phraseology. Bulletin of kaznu: Philology Ser. - 2004. - N8(80). - P. 4-8. 13 Dyusipbaeva K. S. linguistic representations of Kazakh antiquities in the numeral system. Phil.science.Kand.prepare to receive. diss. abstract. - Almaty: 2001. - 28 p. 14 Baranov A. N., Dobrovolsky D. O., Leo Weisgerber in cognitive perspective. - Volume 49, No. 5. 2010. - Pp. 451-458. 15 Uanki M. about the origin of the mysterious number 7 and 40 in Turkic-speaking peoples. // Heritage, 2008. - No. 3, 54 p. 16 Humboldt V. Background. On the distinction between the structure of human languages and ego influence on the spiritual development of a person // Selected works on linguistics. Progress OJSC, 2000. - 400 P. 17 Mankeeva Zh . Kazak tilin zertteudin cognitivtik negizderi // Tiltanym. No. 4. 2001, - 39-44 p. 18 Ryabtseva N.K. Mental vocabulary, cognitive linguistics and anthropocentricity. - M.: 2000. - 232 P. 19 Frumkina R.M. Psycholinguistics. - M. Academy, 2001. - 320 p. 20 Seliverstova O.N. Cognitive semantics against the background of the general development of linguistic science // Questions of linguistics. No. 6. - 2002. - 235 P. 21 Anderson J. Cognitive psychology. 5th ed. - St. Petersburg. Peter: 2002. - 496 P. (the series "master psychology"". 22 Kolshansky G.V. An objective picture of the world of cognition in language. - M., 2002– - 128p. 23 Valiev N. mysterious numbers. Almaty: Zhalyn publ., 2001. - p. 105-108. 24 Help Keiki. "I don't know," he said. - Almaty, 2000. – 256p. 25 Tenishev E. R. Turksky "one"," two","three".// Turkological sbornik. Moscow, 2005 - 104 p. 26 Kairbayeva K. T. symbolic meaning of ethno-cultural names in the Kazakh language. Philol. science. Kand. diss... Almaty, 2004. - 178 P. 27 Raidaut R., Whittit K.. He is a talkative Englishman. "No," I said.: LAN, 1997 – - 257 p. 28 Forty-one kumalak. - Astana, 2001. - 19 p 29 Dyusipbaeva K. S., Akhmedzhanova F. R. Kazakh antiquities with the participation of sacred figures. - Ust-Kamenogorsk, 2001. - 112 p. 30 Kondybay Serikbol. Argikazak mythology. Book 1. Almaty: Dyk-Press, 2004. - 512 p. жүктеу/скачать 425,5 Kb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|